Differential methylation analysis was conducted on site and region level according to the sample groups specified in the analysis.
The following comparisons were made:
The table below summarizes information on the comparisons.
comparison | paired | |
1 | TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN) | FALSE |
2 | TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM) | FALSE |
3 | TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN) | FALSE |
4 | TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN_WGBS) | FALSE |
5 | TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM_WGBS) | FALSE |
6 | TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN_WGBS) | FALSE |
7 | TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN_NOMe) | FALSE |
8 | TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM_NOMe) | FALSE |
9 | TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN_NOMe) | FALSE |
10 | NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TCM) | TRUE |
11 | NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TEM) | TRUE |
12 | NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TN) | TRUE |
13 | Hf03 vs. Hf04 (based on cmp_individual) | FALSE |
In the following anlyses, p-values on the site level were computed using the limma
method. I.e. hierarchical linear models from the limma package were employed and fitted using an empirical Bayes approach on derived M-values.
Differential methylation on the site level was computed based on a variety of metrics. Of particular interest for the following plots and analyses are the following quantities for each site: a) the difference in mean methylation levels of the two groups being compared, b) the quotient in mean methylation and c) a statistical test (limma or t-test depending on the settings) assessing whether the methylation values in the two groups originate from distinct distributions. Additionally each site was assigned a rank based on each of these three criteria. A combined rank is computed as the maximum (i.e. worst) rank among the three ranks. The smaller the combined rank for a site, the more evidence for differential methylation it exhibits. This section includes scatterplots of the site group means as well as volcano plots of each pairwise comparison colored according to the combined ranks or p-values of a given site.
The following rank cutfoffs have been automatically selected for the analysis of differentially methylated sites:
Rank Cutoff | |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN) | 2782607 |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM) | 2442175 |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN) | 4269177 |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN_WGBS) | 6618738 |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM_WGBS) | 5432434 |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN_WGBS) | 7149812 |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN_NOMe) | 11567099 |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM_NOMe) | 3891651 |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN_NOMe) | 10304841 |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TCM) | 3823269 |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TEM) | 10105927 |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TN) | 8853110 |
Hf03 vs. Hf04 (based on cmp_individual) | 127706 |
comparison | |
differential methylation measure |
Scatterplot for differential methylation (sites). If the selected criterion is not rankGradient
:
The transparency corresponds to point density. If the number of points exceeds 2e+06 then the number of points for density estimation is reduced to that number by random sampling.The1% of the points in the sparsest populated plot regions are drawn explicitly (up to a maximum of 10000 points).Additionally, the colored points represent differentially methylated sites (according to the selected criterion).
If the selected criterion is rankGradient
: median combined ranks accross hexagonal bins are shown
as a gradient according to the color legend.
comparison | |
difference metric | |
significance metric |
Volcano plot for differential methylation quantified by various metrics. Color scale according to combined ranking.
A tabular overview of measures for differential methylation on the site level for the individual comparisons are provided in this section. Below, a brief explanation of the different columns can be found:
The tables for the individual comparisons can be found here:
Differential methylation on the region level was computed based on a variety of metrics. Of particular interest for the following plots and analyses are the following quantities for each region: the mean difference in means across all sites in a region of the two groups being compared and the mean of quotients in mean methylation as well as a combined p-value calculated from all site p-values in the region [1]. Additionally each region was assigned a rank based on each of these three criteria. A combined rank is computed as the maximum (i.e. worst) value among the three ranks. The smaller the combined rank for a region, the more evidence for differential methylation it exhibits. Regions were defined based on the region types specified in the analysis. This section includes scatterplots of the region group means as well as volcano plots of each pairwise comparison colored according to the combined rank of a given region.
The following rank cutfoffs have been automatically selected for the analysis of differentially methylated regions:
tiling1kb | cpgislands | genes | promoters | 51Hf0xBlxxCt.cssv1.20151105.enhmrg | ensembleRegBuildBPall | ensembleRegBuildBPctcf | ensembleRegBuildBPdistal | ensembleRegBuildBPdnase | ensembleRegBuildBPproximal | ensembleRegBuildBPtfbs | ensembleRegBuildBPtss | |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN) | 18466 | 32 | 336 | 173 | 4088 | 8249 | 1321 | 5517 | 2774 | 669 | 2431 | 13 |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM) | 24316 | 151 | 457 | 322 | 2899 | 7617 | 1301 | 1864 | 922 | 878 | 2640 | 26 |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN) | 39566 | 36 | 620 | 261 | 8590 | 15449 | 3281 | 5317 | 3480 | 3996 | 4510 | 13 |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN_WGBS) | 42270 | 186 | 952 | 471 | 7690 | 13857 | 2741 | 6315 | 1592 | 1572 | 5017 | 40 |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM_WGBS) | 43325 | 749 | 1069 | 1002 | 5867 | 14207 | 2460 | 4114 | 1998 | 1841 | 4473 | 75 |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN_WGBS) | 35842 | 195 | 933 | 548 | 6682 | 13688 | 2470 | 4378 | 1945 | 1320 | 4973 | 36 |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN_NOMe) | 692224 | 424 | 7780 | 2970 | 56909 | 149534 | 19123 | 41198 | 15698 | 24327 | 38107 | 90 |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM_NOMe) | 774701 | 882 | 10060 | 7303 | 65917 | 165102 | 20984 | 43687 | 16136 | 28199 | 39662 | 346 |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN_NOMe) | 548302 | 411 | 5959 | 2316 | 44990 | 122027 | 14705 | 34192 | 14240 | 19495 | 33248 | 63 |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TCM) | 843124 | 1192 | 15542 | 11015 | 73667 | 181077 | 23182 | 46773 | 16890 | 32892 | 40898 | 1331 |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TEM) | 677342 | 359 | 10679 | 2998 | 62060 | 152063 | 18708 | 38785 | 14259 | 25543 | 34965 | 275 |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TN) | 520554 | 421 | 12761 | 3985 | 59168 | 137724 | 19450 | 32706 | 12767 | 21176 | 32902 | 434 |
Hf03 vs. Hf04 (based on cmp_individual) | 40404 | 248 | 1324 | 1295 | 3477 | 10406 | 1265 | 2763 | 932 | 1486 | 3388 | 54 |
comparison | |
regions | |
differential methylation measure |
Scatterplot for differential methylation (regions). If the selected criterion is not rankGradient
:
The transparency corresponds to point density. The 1% of the points in the sparsest populated plot regions are drawn explicitly.
Additionally, the colored points represent differentially methylated regions (according to the selected criterion).
If the selected criterion is rankGradient
: median combined ranks accross hexagonal bins are shown
as a gradient according to the color legend.
comparison | |
regions | |
difference metric | |
significance metric |
Volcano plot for differential methylation quantified by various metrics. Color scale according to combined ranking.
A tabular overview of measures for differential methylation on the region level for the individual comparisons are provided in this section.
The tables for the individual comparisons can be found here:
tiling1kb | cpgislands | genes | promoters | 51Hf0xBlxxCt.cssv1.20151105.enhmrg | ensembleRegBuildBPall | ensembleRegBuildBPctcf | ensembleRegBuildBPdistal | ensembleRegBuildBPdnase | ensembleRegBuildBPproximal | ensembleRegBuildBPtfbs | ensembleRegBuildBPtss | |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN_WGBS) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM_WGBS) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN_WGBS) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
TCM vs. TN (based on cmp_TCMvsTN_NOMe) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
TCM vs. TEM (based on cmp_TEMvsTCM_NOMe) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
TEM vs. TN (based on cmp_TEMvsTN_NOMe) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TCM) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TEM) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
NOMe vs. WGBS (based on cmp_tech_TN) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
Hf03 vs. Hf04 (based on cmp_individual) | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv | csv |
Enrichment Analysis was conducted. The wordclouds and tables below contains significant GO terms as determined by a hypergeometric test.